David Lynch logic puzzles in Twin Peaks Season 3

Some fun moments that stood pout to me, seems kinda like he specifically crafted these to be like philosophical challenges/puzzles.


 * "We laid everything out, Hawk, and we can't find anything that's missing."  "If it's not here, then... how do you know it's missing?"     "But if it is here... then it isn't missing?"  [makes it seem like it's not logically possible to figure out what is missing from the collection by looking at the collection][memory and evidence][The contrapositive of "If A, then B," is "If not B, then not A." ]
 * "Does a coma have something to do with electricity?" "No," "well in this case it did".  [makes it seem like "anything goes", like you can only talk about particulars, like general/universal statements are impossible or indeterminate, they can be whatever][causality vs.  Coincidence vs.  Subsets of causality] [is this a generalized "Gettier problem"?]
 * "the past dictates the future", "good thing we made so many sandwiches". [most people agree that the past dictates the future. so did making the sandwiches in the past cause so many people to gather there in the future?]